ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2026
NRG-BR002: A Randomized Phase II/III Trial of Metastasis-Directed Ablation With First-Line Systemic Therapy for Oligometastatic Breast Cancer.
Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeMetastasis-directed therapy is increasingly used for oligometastatic breast cancer, despite its uncertain benefit during first-line systemic therapy. We evaluated whether metastasis-directed ablation improves progression-free survival (PFS) compared with first-line systemic therapy alone in patients with oligometastatic breast cancer.
methodsNRG-BR002 is a randomized phase II/III trial across US/Canadian institutions. Participants had ≤4 metastases, controlled primary disease, ≤12 months of first-line systemic therapy without progression with all visible metastases amenable to stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or surgical resection and were randomly assigned 1:1 to systemic therapy alone (no ablation) or with metastasis-directed ablation (ablation). The primary end point was PFS, defined as time to progression or death. Secondary end points included overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) were evaluated as exploratory biomarkers.
resultsFrom December 2014 to September 2019, 129 patients were enrolled; 125 were eligible for analysis. Median age was 54 years; 79% had hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‑negative disease, 60% solitary metastasis, 50% bone involvement, and 37% bone only. Ablation was delivered via SBRT for 93%. With 72 PFS events and a median follow-up of 29.9 months, median PFS was 23.0 months (no ablation) versus 19.5 months (ablation; hazard ratio [HR], 0.92 [70% CI, 0.71 to 1.17; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.47]; one-sided
conclusionThe addition of metastasis-directed ablation added to first-line systemic therapy did not improve PFS or OS in patients with oligometastatic breast cancer. Ablation should not be routinely used outside of clinical trials, except for palliation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.