ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2026
Palatability assessment of a commercial wet renal diet in healthy cats: an open-label in-home exploratory trial.
Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWet renal diets are considered the best option for managing cats with chronic kidney disease (CKD), but their palatability is a recurrent concern. HYPOTHESIS/
objectivesAssess the palatability of a commercial wet diet formulated for early-stage CKD in cats. ANIMALS: Forty-two healthy cats privately owned by 31 caregivers.
methodsAn open-label in-home feeding trial was conducted over three 6-day phases, during which cats were offered the wet renal diet (Phase 1), their usual wet diet (Phase 2), and both diets simultaneously (Phase 3). Time from diet presentation to eating (latency time), food intake, and feeding-related behaviors were recorded by caregivers. Analyses included descriptive statistics and mixed-effects regression models.
resultsCaregivers classified renal diet acceptance as positive for 69.0% (n = 29) of cats, negative for 23.8% (n = 10), and neutral for 7.1% (n = 3). Overall, cats were significantly more likely (P < .001) to be recorded in a higher diet intake category in Phase 2 than in Phase 1, whereas latency time did not differ significantly (P = .07). Based on recorded intake during Phase 3, neither diet was significantly preferred (P = .34), although caregivers perceived a preference for the usual diet in 47.6% (n = 20) of cats and for the renal diet in 45.2% (n = 19). If prescribed, caregivers would offer this therapeutic diet to 78.6% (n = 33) of cats. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: In this short-term feeding trial, most healthy cats accepted the renal diet formulated for early-stage CKD with no apparent palatability concerns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.