ArticlePloS one2026
Systematic modelling of a large-scale, historicised, well-detailed building land use, with the fusion of massive and heterogeneous datasets.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Buildings are the primary venues for human activity. Generating precise numeric building models is of great interest for many applications. At regional and national scales, many different formalisms are employed to represent the various components of buildings, yet the building land use is frequently oversimplified - even when mixed-use buildings are considered. Inferring a realistic building land use, defined as an inventory of the distinct functional spaces hosted by a building, brings valuable knowledge for building models. Manual measurement can produce highly realistic interior models, but such approaches are labour-intensive and must be conducted on a case-by-case basis. We introduce a fully automated workflow that systematically simulates a well-described building land use by integrating three complementary tasks: (1) use-oriented building object modelling - defining building objects that capture building land use, (2) activity census and conflation - aggregating and reconciling activity records from heterogeneous datasets, and (3) logical attribute generation - deriving detailed attributes for housing units and activities in relation to the characteristics of their host building and other environmental factors. The workflow adapts to varying levels of data availability and attribute richness, and it supports "recent-period historicisation" (i.e., reconstructing past states of the built environment). Because the entire pipeline is automated, it can be deployed at a large scale; we demonstrate its application to an entire country. We evaluate the method through multiple validation procedures, including comparisons with ground truth measurements, showing that the approach reliably reproduces building land use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.