ArticlePloS one2026
YOLO-CCG: An enhanced model for weed detection in complex cotton fields.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate weed detection is essential for site-specific herbicide application in cotton production. However, variations in weed appearance, complex field backgrounds, uneven target distributions, and leaf occlusion can result in missed detections and false positives. To address these challenges, this study proposes YOLO-CCG, an improved YOLO11-based model for weed detection in cotton fields. First, the Coordinate Attention (CA) mechanism is introduced into the backbone to embed spatial coordinate information into channel attention, thereby strengthening target localization and the representation of discriminative weed features. Second, nearest-neighbor upsampling in the neck is replaced with the Content-Aware ReAssembly of Features (CARAFE) module, which performs content-aware feature reassembly to preserve fine-grained spatial information during feature fusion. Finally, GSConv and the VoVGSCSP lightweight module are introduced into the bottom-up path of the neck to replace the corresponding standard convolution and C3k2 blocks, reducing computational complexity without increasing the parameter count. Experimental results show that, compared with YOLO11s, YOLO-CCG achieves relative improvements of 0.4%, 2.2%, 0.8%, and 1.7% in precision, recall, mAP50, and mAP50-95, respectively. These results indicate that YOLO-CCG provides an accurate and computationally efficient solution for weed detection in complex cotton-field environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.