ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
A physiologically constrained calibration framework for cardiovascular models applied to a paediatric synthetic sepsis population.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Calibration of mechanistic cardiovascular models is a central barrier to their use in population analysis and patient-specific simulation, particularly in settings where key physiological variables are unobservable and multiple parameter combinations can reproduce the same haemodynamic targets. In this work, we present Embedded Feedback Controller (EFC), a calibration framework for ODE-based lumped-parameter cardiovascular models in which selected physiological parameters are promoted to dynamic states and driven toward prescribed targets through embedded controller equations. By exploiting the qualitative structure of the governing equations, EFC enforces physiologically consistent parameter-variable relationships and converges to the single solution admitted by an over-determined set of targets, reproducibly and independently of the initial conditions, at a cost that scales efficiently with model complexity. The framework is demonstrated in silico, using a mechanistic cardiovascular model to generate virtual paediatric populations spanning normal physiology and two septic shock phenotypes (warm and cold shock) from literature-derived target ranges, achieving <1% residual error across pressures, flows, and compartmental volumes. The resulting parameter distributions are consistent, by construction with theoretical haemodynamic adaptations in paediatric sepsis, including alterations in vascular resistance, compliance, cardiac elastance, and effective blood volume. Importantly, persistent calibration residuals arise when target combinations are structurally incompatible with the model and the parameter carrying the residual is held at a bound, providing an explicit and interpretable diagnostic of feasibility limits. These results establish EFC as a general, scalable calibration strategy for mechanistic cardiovascular models and a practical foundation for virtual population generation and future patient-specific digital twin applications in critical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.