Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42842618›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2026

Integrated in vivo and transcriptomic analyses of lethal Oropouche virus infection reveal suppression of pathogenic host responses by antiviral therapy.

Cássia Sousa Moraes, Gabriel Gonzalez, Akihiko Sato, Shigeru Miki, Atsuko Inoue, Koshiro Tabata, Joshua W Kranrod, Chilekwa Frances Kabamba, Aiko Ohnuma, Keita Matsuno and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Cássia Sousa MoraesDivision of Biological Response Analysis, Institute for Vaccine Research and Development, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1954-6455
Gabriel GonzalezDivision of Research Support, Institute for Vaccine Research and Development, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2180-2120
Akihiko SatoDivision of Biological Response Analysis, Institute for Vaccine Research and Development, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6625-1679
Shigeru MikiDivision of Vaccinology for Clinical Development, Institute for Vaccine Research and Development, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Atsuko InoueDivision of Biological Response Analysis, Institute for Vaccine Research and Development, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3267-3908
Koshiro TabataDivision of Biological Response Analysis, Institute for Vaccine Research and Development, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0227-2515
Joshua W KranrodDivision of Biological Response Analysis, Institute for Vaccine Research and Development, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8596-3153
Chilekwa Frances KabambaDivision of Biological Response Analysis, Institute for Vaccine Research and Development, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1326-5272
Aiko OhnumaTechnical Office, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Keita MatsunoDivision of Biological Response Analysis, Institute for Vaccine Research and Development, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4205-6526
Rio HaradaDivision of Biological Response Analysis, Institute for Vaccine Research and Development, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3738-9658
Shinji SaitoDivision of Biological Response Analysis, Institute for Vaccine Research and Development, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Naoki AkimotoGraduate School of Infectious Diseases, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Michihito SasakiDivision of Biological Response Analysis, Institute for Vaccine Research and Development, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1607-2175
Yasuko OrbaDivision of Biological Response Analysis, Institute for Vaccine Research and Development, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9910-3912
William W HallDivision of Biological Response Analysis, Institute for Vaccine Research and Development, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Hirofumi SawaDivision of Biological Response Analysis, Institute for Vaccine Research and Development, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2569-2755
Yukari ItakuraDivision of Biological Response Analysis, Institute for Vaccine Research and Development, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3463-1834

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oropouche virus (OROV) is an emerging arbovirus responsible for large outbreaks of febrile illness in Central and South America, with increasing reports of severe neurological disease and fatal outcomes. Despite its growing public health impact, no approved antiviral therapies or vaccines are currently available. Here, we show that favipiravir, a broad-spectrum nucleoside analogue, robustly suppresses OROV replication and disease in vivo. In a lethal Syrian hamster model, favipiravir treatment provided complete protection against OROV infection, preventing viral dissemination to peripheral organs and the central nervous system, and remained highly effective when administration was initiated after infection. In contrast, insufficient antiviral control resulted in viral neuroinvasion and fatality. To define host responses associated with OROV pathogenesis and their modulation by antiviral therapy, we performed transcriptomic profiling of liver and brain tissues. OROV infection induced interferon-driven inflammatory programs accompanied by marked disruption of metabolic and tissue homeostatic pathways, whereas these transcriptional signatures were largely abrogated by favipiravir treatment. Together, our findings identify favipiravir as a potent antiviral candidate against OROV and provide the first in vivo, tissue-resolved transcriptomic framework of OROV infection, linking effective viral suppression with the prevention of neuroinvasion and pathogenic host responses. These results highlight antiviral intervention as a viable strategy to mitigate OROV-associated disease and mortality.

Indexed as

AmidesAntiviral AgentsBunyaviridae InfectionsOrthobunyavirusPyrazinesAnimalsCricetinaeGene Expression ProfilingMesocricetusTranscriptomeVirus ReplicationAmidesAntiviral AgentsfavipiravirPyrazines

Identifiers

PMID42842618
PMCPMC13657405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.