Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42842600›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Neurological tissue dissection techniques in mouse models for reproducible scientific results: Brain, spinal cord, cerebrospinal fluid, and sciatic nerve.

Lilia Crew, Alyssa Seerley, Serena McElroy, Andrea Grindeland Panter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lilia CrewTouro University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Great Falls, Montana, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6016-1644
Alyssa SeerleyWeissman Hood Institute at Touro University; McLaughlin Research Institute, Great Falls, Montana, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6569-3833
Serena McElroyWeissman Hood Institute at Touro University; McLaughlin Research Institute, Great Falls, Montana, United States of America.
Andrea Grindeland PanterTouro University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Great Falls, Montana, United States of America.

Funding

Modulation of Exosome Release for Functional Restoration in Age-related Retinal DisordersP20GM152335 · NIGMS · MC LAUGHLIN RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Renee A Reijo Pera · 2024 to 2026
$11.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM152335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomedical research studies, specifically regarding human neurodegenerative diseases, are bound by ethical challenges, and have limited diagnostic and treatment options. Transgenic mouse models provide the opportunity to conduct feasible and practical research with the ability to precisely define the progression of neurodegenerative disease over a well-controlled dosage and timeline. The use of transgenic mouse models has been extensive and is critical to advancing research in many ways, including understanding brain morphology and general tissue changes caused by neurological diseases. Often, these studies require specific brain regions or other neurological tissues which may be difficult to obtain. Unfortunately, specific extraction and dissection protocols are few and far between, leading to inconsistent results and a lack of reproducibility. A well-defined protocol, for dissection and extraction, is instrumental for acquisition of reproducible experimental results. Five mouse-specific protocols are described here: brain extraction, brain microdissection, spinal cord extrusion, cerebral spinal fluid collection, and sciatic nerve dissection. Each protocol was completed under biosafety level 2 (BSL-2) guidelines, similar to the sterility precautions required in human surgery. Each protocol also includes a required materials list that defines proper instruments and usage. The protocols were refined based on feedback from numerous research studies in transcriptomics and pharmaceutical development. These protocols minimize tissue damage, increase dissection accuracy, and increase reproducibility of results while developing skills directly transferable to clinical settings. This study provides well-defined, succinct, accessible protocols that support advancements in many cross-disciplinary areas.

Indexed as

BrainCerebrospinal FluidDissectionSciatic NerveSpinal CordAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansMiceMice, TransgenicReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID42842600
PMCPMC13645030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.