ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Stakeholder perspectives on telemedicine acceptance and experiences in Uganda: A qualitative study.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Uganda and other low- and middle-income countries, access to healthcare is constrained by shortages of health workers, long travel distances, and inadequate infrastructure. Telemedicine offers a potential solution, but its effectiveness depends on how key stakeholders perceive, accept, and experience it. This study explored the acceptance and experiences of telemedicine by policymakers, healthcare providers, and service users in Kampala, Uganda. An exploratory qualitative study was conducted between November 2024 and February 2025 at four sites in Kampala: Rocket Health, Uganda Cancer Institute, Butabika National Referral Mental Hospital, and the Ministry of Health. Participants were purposively selected to ensure direct experience with telemedicine. Data was collected through 15 key informant interviews with policymakers and healthcare providers and three focus group discussions with service users (patients and caregivers) who had accessed telemedicine within the previous year. Interviews and discussions were conducted in English or Luganda, audio-recorded with consent, and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed thematically using Braun and Clarke's six-phase approach, supported by NVivo 12 software. Three main themes emerged: perceived benefits, perceived challenges, and recommendations for improving telemedicine. Participants described telemedicine as convenient, reducing travel and contributing to cost and time savings. It also enhanced continuity of care, flexibility, privacy, and autonomy. These benefits were particularly evident among people with disabilities and digitally literate urban users. However, challenges included poor internet connectivity, limited infrastructure, low digital literacy, concerns about diagnostic accuracy without physical examination, and variable levels of trust, with some participants preferring in-person interaction. Telemedicine was perceived as acceptable and useful. However, its broader adoption is limited by structural, technical, and trust-related barriers. Addressing these challenges will require investment in infrastructure, strengthened digital literacy, provider training, increased public awareness, and a robust national telemedicine policy to support equitable and sustainable integration into healthcare delivery in Uganda.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.