ArticlePloS one2026
Shedding light on amphipod behaviour: Baseline locomotion behaviour for laboratory ecotoxicology experiments.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Behavioural endpoints offer a sensitive, non-invasive alternative to traditional mortality assays. Yet, they remain underutilized in regulatory frameworks due to a lack of standardised methodologies and baseline behavioural data. This study investigates the baseline locomotion of the marine amphipod Marinogammarus marinus to external light triggers to support standardised laboratory behavioural assays. Using an automated observation chamber, here we tracked swimming behaviour in response to light stimuli, quantifying locomotion as distance travelled. Groups of eight amphipods were tested in large crystalizing dishes over four days in an 8-minute trial involving two light exposures. A total of 60 individuals - males, females, and brooding females - were assessed. Light consistently triggered activity, with males showing strong negative phototaxis and brooding females the weakest. A startle response was observed within 3-5 seconds of initial light exposure, though responses diminished with repetition, suggesting potential overstimulation or habituation. Inter-individual and day-to-day variability highlighted the need for repeated measures. Additional trials with 32 males evaluated the effects of experimental conditions. Wall-hugging (thigmotaxis) appeared to be an escape response, not anxiety-related. Notable decreases in dissolved oxygen and pH within 24 hours were attributed to the amphipods' presence rather than activity, while salinity fluctuations due to evaporation did not visibly affect behaviour. Differences between male groups from the two separate experiments suggest behavioural shifts due to seasonal variation. This study establishes baseline behavioural data for M. marinus and demonstrates the value of automated tracking systems in behavioural assays in laboratory settings. It emphasizes the need to account for sex, size, and temporal variation in assay design and supports integrating behavioural endpoints into regulatory protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.