Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42842539›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Linear morphometrics fail to support strong sexual dimorphism in Uintatherium anceps.

Kevin D Mulcahy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kevin D MulcahyBiodiversity Institute and Natural History Museum, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6739-7554

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uintatheres, mammals belonging to the extinct order Dinocerata, are among the most recognizable of all Paleogene (~66-23 Ma) organisms. Unmistakable for their bizarre skulls with multiple pairs of horns and saber-like upper canines, uintatheres have captivated paleontologists since the late nineteenth century. Since their initial discovery, uintatheres have been regarded as a classic example of dramatic sexual dimorphism in the fossil record, with males purported to be larger and possess more prominent horns and canines than females. However, the hypothesis that uintatheres were highly sexually dimorphic has never been formally tested. Here, traditional, linear morphometrics are implemented with a collection including most known skulls of Uintatherium anceps to quantify patterns of cranial variation within this taxon. Use of univariate and multivariate statistical approaches provides some evidence of dimorphism in Uintatherium, particularly in the length of the canines, but the expected signals of strong sexual dimorphism are generally lacking. To verify the approaches used, the same suite of analyses was performed on a similarly sized dataset from Bison bison. Statistical signals of sexual dimorphism are clearer in this extant taxon. Comparison with other extant mammalian herbivores reveals that the estimated level of sexual dimorphism in skull length for Uintatherium is not especially high. In light of these findings, as well as the current understanding of uintathere systematics and paleoecology, it is argued that extreme sexual dimorphism should not be treated as the null hypothesis for this clade. These results may point to a broader pattern in mammalian evolution in which traits like horns and large canines emerge in both males and females of a species despite being primarily selected for in one sex.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAnimalsFemaleFossilsMaleSkull

Identifiers

PMID42842539
PMCPMC13645082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.