ArticlePloS one2026
Who is disrupting whom? Examining the nighttime activity patterns of humans and their dogs.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Few studies have examined the nighttime dynamic between humans and dogs, but existing research suggests dogs can disrupt human sleep. In this study, we examined the nighttime activity of 25 Canadian participants, totaling 38 human-dog pairs using accelerometers and survey data. We used linear mixed effects models to assess the drivers of variability in both human sleep and dog nighttime activity, and a generalized linear model to assess the effects of demographic variables on self-reported sleep quality. None of the variables significantly affected objective sleep measures in humans or dog nighttime activity. Dog sleeping location did not affect human perceived sleep quality, but having multiple dogs was associated with poorer subjective sleep (p = 0.042). Human and dog nighttime activities were found to be significantly correlated. Additionally, we conducted a time series analysis to determine lagged correlations between human and dog activities within five minutes. Among the 61% dyads that showed correlation in activity states, human activity preceding dog activity (45%) occurred more often than dog activity preceding human activity (18%). In 36% of dyads, activity was synchronized within the same 1-minute period. Overall, co-sleeping (i.e., bedsharing) had no effect on sleep duration or efficiency in humans or nighttime activity in dogs. The only significant predictor we found was the presence of other dogs, which affected subjective but not objective human sleep quality, revealing a discrepancy between self-reported and objectively measured sleep. Both humans and their dogs impact the nighttime activity of one another, demonstrating our species' inseparable and reciprocal relationship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.