Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42842528›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Accessibility and surface area drive desert toad presence at artificial water sites in the Great Basin and Mojave Deserts.

Leah N Gordillo, Nathalie Larios-Chavez, Gisel Larios, Robert N Knight, Randy T Larsen, Brock R McMillan, Lucas K Hall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Leah N GordilloDepartment of Biology, California State University Bakersfield, Bakersfield, California, United States of America.
Nathalie Larios-ChavezDepartment of Biology, California State University Bakersfield, Bakersfield, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9961-5962
Gisel LariosDepartment of Biology, California State University Bakersfield, Bakersfield, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1687-8873
Robert N KnightAir Force Nuclear Weapons Center, Sentinel System Program Office, Hill Air Force Base, Utah, United States of America.
Randy T LarsenDepartment of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America.
Brock R McMillanDepartment of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America.
Lucas K HallDepartment of Biology, California State University Bakersfield, Bakersfield, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4654-5412

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial Water Sites (AWS) are human-made or modified water sources constructed or maintained for livestock, select wildlife game species, or other management purposes in arid environments. However, non-target species such as desert toads have been documented utilizing AWS. Because the reproductive ecology of desert toads relies on water, understanding factors explaining their presence at AWS can inform conservation practices. To address this lack of information, we examined how AWS design, spatial isolation, local terrain, and surrounding vegetation influenced toad presence in the Great Basin and Mojave Deserts. From May to June 2011, we surveyed 68 AWS for species presence of toads and quantified AWS design features and environmental variables. We detected Great Basin spadefoot toads (Spea intermontana) at 61% of Great Basin AWS and red-spotted toads (Anaxyrus punctatus) at 38% of Mojave AWS. We used generalized mixed-effects models and AIC model selection to identify the most informative variables. Top performing predictors resulted in the final model 'access height (lowest distance between water edge and ground surface) + surface area (surface area coverage of water)', which accounted for 86% of model weight. The predictor 'access height' had a significant negative association with toad presence whereas 'surface area' had a significant positive association. Spatial isolation, terrain, and vegetation predictors were not found to influence toad occurrence. Our results indicate that AWS design, specifically lower access height and increased surface area, enhances desert toad use, potentially improving amphibian habitat suitability and persistence.

Indexed as

BufonidaeDesert ClimateWaterAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemWater

Identifiers

PMID42842528
PMCPMC13645041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.