Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42842517›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Social dynamics signals in archaeological time-series: How cultural transmission and production biases shape assemblage diversity.

Aleksandr Diachenko, Detlef Gronenborn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aleksandr DiachenkoInstitute of Archaeology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6959-2919
Detlef GronenbornLeibniz-Zentrum für Archäologie, Mainz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6467-5643

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-resolution studies on scales of decades to centuries indicate that social systems shift to greater complexity and back, a phenomenon usually referred to as social cycles. In archaeological data, such cycles are reflected in the increase and decrease of diversity in material culture signals. However, the exact correlation between assemblage diversity cycles and social complexity remains unclear. Addressing this topic, our model investigates the impact of cultural transmission and production biases on the variation in material culture sets and explains how the observable variability in empirical evidence results from the same basic complex dynamic behavior. A single mathematical algorithm describes path-dependency, gradual changes, and rapid transformations of the empirically visible assemblage composition as the replacement of components of material culture in archaeological assemblages. Our simulations capture the direct impact of short-term fluctuations and delayed sensitive dependence on the initial conditions (chaotic effects) of the assemblage diversity. The model finds a decrease in variation (standardization) in assemblages to be an outcome of production bias, potentially reflecting changes in social complexity.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyAlgorithmsCultural EvolutionHumansModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID42842517
PMCPMC13645070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.