Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42842249›Full record

Observational studyJAMA network open2026

Outcomes for American Indian and Alaska Native Populations With Cancer in Traditional Medicare.

T Anders Olsen, Matthew Tobey

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

T Anders OlsenBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Matthew TobeyMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: American Indian and Alaska Native patients represent a uniquely vulnerable population in the US. Epidemiological studies have shown significant health disparities within this group. Contemporary outcomes and utilization studies of cancer in this population could aid in public health interventions in the future. Objective: To analyze utilization, spending, and mortality outcomes for American Indian and Alaska Native beneficiaries with cancer covered by traditional Medicare (TM). Design, Setting, and Participants: A multiyear cross-sectional analysis of a near population of TM beneficiaries in the US using Medicare beneficiary summary files and prescription drug event International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) linked claims from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2023. Exposures: TM coverage for American Indian and Alaska Native beneficiaries with cancer. Main Outcomes and Measures: Aggregate claims for care utilization and spending from Medicare Parts A, B, and D to assess cancer prevalence, care utilization (ie, inpatient, outpatient, and prescription usage), total spending, mortality and secondary outcomes (hospice usage, screening utilization, and out-of-pocket costs). Results: A sample of 26 867 866 TM beneficiaries in 2023 had 123 597 (0.46%) identifying as American Indian and Alaska Native (69 294 [56%] female). In this American Indian and Alaska Native subpopulation, 10.8% (n = 13 291) had a cancer diagnosis, lower than the 19.4% (5 211 773) prevalence noted in the overall TM population. The annual all-cause mortality rate among American Indian and Alaska Native beneficiaries with cancer in 2023 was 12.4% (1643), nearly double the overall TM cancer population at 6.9% (358 049). American Indian and Alaska Native beneficiaries had elevated rates of renal, hepatocellular, and biliary carcinomas. The mean (SD) spending per American Indian and Alaska Native beneficiary with cancer spent was $32 775 ($58 089) annually whereas the mean (SD) spending per TM beneficiary was $25 073 ($47 226) annually. Annual uptake of breast and colorectal screenings were lowest among American Indian and Alaska Native beneficiaries. Finally, only 939 of 1642 American Indian and Alaska Native beneficiaries with cancer (57.2%) filed hospice claims near date of death, lower than the 234 809 of 357 941 in the overall TM population (65.6%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional analysis the American Indian and Alaska Native cancer population experienced significant differences in spending and outcomes in TM from 2016 through 2023. American Indian and Alaska Native beneficiaries with cancer displayed the worst all-cause mortality across demographics, elevated total and out-of-pocket spending as well as lower rates of apparent access to preventive and hospice services. The magnitude of these differences is critical in formulating action plans to promote health and reduce cancer among American Indian and Alaska Native beneficiaries.

Indexed as

Alaska NativesIndians, North AmericanMedicareNeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth ExpendituresHumansMaleUnited States

Identifiers

PMID42842249
PMCPMC13647147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.