Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42842247›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Surrogate Decision-Making for Older Adults With and Without Dementia.

Lauren Hersch Nicholas, Scott D Halpern, Kenneth M Langa, Mario Macis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lauren Hersch NicholasDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.
Scott D HalpernUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.
Kenneth M LangaUniversity of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor.
Mario MacisJohns Hopkins Carey Business School, Washington, DC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: End-of-life care for older individuals in the US frequently includes interventions that may be burdensome and inconsistent with patient preferences. Few experimental studies have assessed potentially modifiable factors associated with surrogate recommendations. Objectives: To assess whether experimentally varied patient and decision-context factors are associated with participant treatment recommendations for seriously ill older adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this survey study, a nationally representative sample of US adults aged 18 years or older who were members of the Ipsos KnowledgePanel survey platform were surveyed from December 8 to 19, 2022. Data were analyzed from April 2023 to July 2026. Exposure: Randomized vignettes with varying dementia status, advance directive status and wishes, treatment framing, physician recommendations, hospital norms for care of similar patients, patient sex, and the surrogate's relationship to the patient. Main Outcomes and Measures: Whether participants recommended that surrogates choose life-sustaining treatments (LSTs) vs comfort-focused care for a hypothetical hospitalized patient aged 85 years who was severely ill, currently unconscious, and functionally dependent before admission. Results: Of 6019 individuals who started the survey, 5965 (99.1%) completed at least 1 vignette response (mean [SD] respondent age, 53.7 [16.9] years; 3079 [51.6%] female), including 2004 caregivers of an adult and 3175 with chronic illness, a mobility limitation, and/or recent emergency or urgent care use. When holding other randomized vignette features constant, participants recommended that surrogates choose LSTs for 15.6% (95% CI, 14.0%-17.2%) of patients with dementia without an advance directive compared with 41.0% (95% CI, 38.8%-43.1%) of those with an advance directive requesting LSTs and 7.6% (95% CI, 6.4%-8.8%) of patients with an advance directive requesting comfort care only. For patients who did not have dementia, participants recommended that surrogates choose life-extending treatment for 38.9% (95% CI, 36.7%-41.0%), 66.3% (95% CI, 64.2%-68.3%), and 14.4% (95% CI, 12.8%-15.9%) of patients in the respective advance directive groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study of US adults, respondents were less likely to recommend that surrogates choose LSTs for patients with dementia than for patients without dementia even when advance directives requested all care possible. These findings highlight the importance of preparing patients and surrogates for care decisions through explicit discussions of goals of care and decision-making roles.

Indexed as

Decision MakingDementiaProxyTerminal CareAdultAdvance DirectivesAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID42842247
PMCPMC13647146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.