ReviewEuropean geriatric medicine2026
Very late-onset myasthenia gravis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical severity and long-term outcomes.
Review in European geriatric medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeVery late-onset myasthenia gravis (vloMG; onset ≥ 65 years) may represent a clinically distinct subgroup, but its severity and prognosis remain uncertain. We systematically reviewed studies comparing vloMG with earlier-onset MG (non-vloMG) and examined whether findings differed from the conventional early-onset (EOMG) versus late-onset dichotomy (LOMG; ≥ 50 years).
methodsMEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to May 2026. Observational studies of adult MG comparing age-at-onset groups were eligible. The main quantitative outcome was severe early presentation, defined as Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) class IV-V early at the disease course (at onset, diagnosis, or the earliest pretreatment assessment). Other baseline and longitudinal outcomes were summarized qualitatively because outcome definitions and follow-up duration were heterogeneous.
resultsTen studies were included. Four studies including 647 patients with vloMG and 1,620 with non-vloMG contributed to the primary meta-analysis. Severe early presentation was more frequent in vloMG than in non-vloMG (10.2% vs 3.8%; Odds Ratio 2.19, 95%CI 1.49-3.24; p < 0.001; I
conclusionvloMG is associated with more severe early presentation, but long-term disease control may not differ from non-vloMG. Future studies should standardize age strata, follow-up, treatment exposure, and confounder adjustment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42842206What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.