ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2026
A preoperative risk-scoring model for predicting intraoperative hemorrhage during endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasms.
Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntraoperative hemorrhage is the most frequent complication of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We aim to develop and externally validate a preoperative risk-scoring model for predicting intraoperative hemorrhage during ESD for gastric neoplasms.
methodsPatients who underwent ESD for gastric neoplasms from four endoscopy centers were enrolled in this retrospective study, with 1123 patients in derivation cohort and 345 patients in validation cohort. In derivation cohort, univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to identify independent preoperative predictors of intraoperative hemorrhage. A risk-scoring model was created by assigning weighted points to selected predictors. External validation was conducted to analyse the discrimination and calibration of the prediction model.
resultsA prediction model for intraoperative hemorrhage included 5 variables: upper-third location (5 points), large lesion size (≥ 25 mm) (4 points), current HP infection (3 points), junior endoscopist (3 points) and middle-third location (2 points). Patients were stratified into low- (0-2 points), intermediate- (3-4 points), high- (5-6 points), and very high-risk (≥ 7 points) groups, with corresponding bleeding rates of 4.8%, 35.9%, 80.2% and 98.5%, respectively. In external validation cohort, the model showed excellent discrimination, with a c-statistic of 0.96 (95% CI 0.95-0.98), and good calibration (calibration-in-the-large, - 0.04; calibration slope, 0.94).
conclusionsWe developed a preoperative risk-scoring model to predict intraoperative hemorrhage of ESD for gastric neoplasms. For lesions of large size or located on the upper-third of the stomach, ESD should be performed by senior endoscopists after successful HP eradication to minimize the occurrence of bleeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42842191What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.