Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42842180›Full record

ArticleEmergency radiology2026

MRI of acute appendicitis in pregnancy: navigating diagnostic pitfalls and challenges.

Boeun Lee, Jieun Byun

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Boeun LeeDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, 25, Magokdong-ro 2-gil, Gangseo-gu, Seoul, 07804, Republic of Korea.
Jieun ByunDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, 25, Magokdong-ro 2-gil, Gangseo-gu, Seoul, 07804, Republic of Korea. sueno54@naver.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2722-7726

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the preferred cross-sectional imaging modality for suspected appendicitis in pregnancy, yet its interpretation is uniquely challenging. This pictorial review moves beyond simple appendiceal diameter thresholds to the practical pitfalls encountered in daily practice. We show how the enlarging gravid uterus displaces the appendix and how physiologic changes mask inflammatory signs. We also address the diagnostic uncertainty of the equivocal appendix and the need to recognize subtle secondary features on MRI. We then detail several important entities that may confound interpretation, either by mimicking an inflamed appendix or by obscuring a normal one: pelvic venous engorgement, terminal ileitis, cecal diverticulitis, ovarian torsion, and ectopic pregnancy. For each, we highlight the features that help distinguish them. Finally, we discuss technical limitations such as field inhomogeneity and motion artifacts. We present a stepwise approach to locating the appendix paired with a problem-solving strategy that combines non-fat-suppressed and fat-suppressed T2-weighted sequences. By recognizing these multifaceted pearls and pitfalls, radiologists can improve diagnostic confidence and optimize care in this challenging population.

Indexed as

AppendicitisMagnetic resonance imagingPregnancy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.