ReviewCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2026
Novel device-based and catheter-directed therapies for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
Review in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) presents a major clinical and therapeutic challenge owing to its complex pathophysiology and pronounced clinical heterogeneity. While traditional empirical strategies targeting comorbidities offered limited success, recent advances in molecular, hemodynamic, and autonomic profiling have catalyzed a fundamental shift toward phenotype-guided, personalized management. Clinical trial insights underscore that precise patient selection is paramount for therapeutic efficacy; for example, interatrial shunt interventions demonstrate clinical benefits primarily in patients without elevated exercise pulmonary vascular resistance, whereas improper application risks right ventricular decompensation. Simultaneously, novel device-based modalities, including transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation, cardiac contractility modulation, splanchnic nerve ablation, and adjustable interatrial shunts, are emerging as promising avenues to directly address underlying mechanisms such as systemic inflammation, impaired calcium handling, and volume redistribution. Moving forward, the management paradigm of HFpEF will increasingly shift from monotherapy to synergistic multimodal approaches. Combining established foundational pharmacotherapies, such as sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, with continuous pulmonary artery pressure monitoring and targeted interventional devices holds immense potential to establish closed-loop, individualized treatment strategies. In this review, we synthesize current clinical evidence, highlight key anatomical and hemodynamic considerations, evaluate emerging device platforms, and discuss future strategic perspectives aimed at optimizing precision medicine for patients with HFpEF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42842133What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.