Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42842126›Full record

ReviewSports medicine - open2026

The Heel-Strike Fallacy and Cadence Beliefs in Distance Running: A Narrative Review.

Aurélien Patoz, Cyrille Gindre, Thibault Lussiana, Bastiaan Breine

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sports medicine - open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aurélien Patoz *Research and Development Department, Volodalen SwissSportLab, 1023, Crissier, Switzerland. aurelien@volodalen.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6949-7989
Cyrille Gindre *Research and Development Department, Volodalen SwissSportLab, 1023, Crissier, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-2410-8209
Thibault Lussiana *Research and Development Department, Volodalen SwissSportLab, 1023, Crissier, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1782-401X
Bastiaan Breine *Research and Development Department, Volodalen SwissSportLab, 1023, Crissier, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7959-7721

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Running-technique recommendations often convert group-level observations and acute biomechanical responses into universal prescriptions. This narrative review examines three beliefs: rearfoot striking is inherently harmful, 180 steps/min is universally optimal, and increasing cadence while maintaining a given running speed consistently reduces loading and overuse injury risk. Current evidence does not support these generalizations. First, rearfoot striking is not consistently associated with greater impact-related metrics or overuse injury risk, and external impact measures do not directly represent tissue-specific loading. Second, cadence varies substantially with running speed, morphology, footwear, and surface, while energetically optimal cadence varies between individuals rather than being fixed at 180 steps/min. Third, although increasing cadence can acutely modify selected mechanical variables, these responses are heterogeneous, have not been shown to consistently reduce injury risk, and may partly reflect concurrent changes in stance-flight organization. Duty factor (DF), the proportion of the stride spent in contact with the ground, provides a complementary temporal descriptor that can help interpret these cadence-related responses. Under level, submaximal running conditions, DF is associated with selected external and modeled internal loads, but current evidence is predominantly mechanistic. Clinical application should therefore begin by determining whether change is warranted, identifying the tissue-specific or functional objective, and selecting whether and how to modify foot-strike pattern or cadence according to condition-specific evidence and the runner's response. DF may additionally be monitored to characterize accompanying changes in stance-flight organization. Acute biomechanical changes should not be assumed to improve symptoms or performance, or to reduce injury risk. Future studies should test sustained clinical effects, individual response patterns, and transfer to real-world conditions.

Indexed as

CadenceDuty factorFoot-strike patternGait retrainingMusculoskeletal loadingOveruse injuryRunning myth

Identifiers

PMID42842126
PMCPMC13646233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.