ArticleThe Saudi dental journal2026
Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of root canal morphology in primary mandibular molars: a retrospective study with clinical implications for pediatric endodontics.
Article in The Saudi dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This retrospective study aims to evaluate the root canal morphology (RCM) of mandibular primary molars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging. The participants were pediatric patients who received CBCT examinations at a public hospital during their dental visits. Information regarding children's age and gender was pooled from the dental records. Root canal counts, root counts, root length, and orifice distribution patterns of the eligible mandibular primary molars were analyzed by two calibrated pediatric dentists. A total of 398 mandibular primary molars were identified from 117 children. These molars had 2 to 4 roots. Two roots were observed among 88.59% of first primary molars (Ds) and 77.57% of second primary molars (Es). Three canals were most frequently observed among first mandibular primary molars, whereas the second mandibular molars predominantly had four canals. Boys had longer mesial roots than girls (p = 0.003). Molars with 5 canals presented with longer distal roots (9.08 ± 0.68) than molars with two canals (6.63 ± 0.83, adjusted p = 0.003) or three canals (7.50 ± 1.31, adjusted p = 0.049). Canal count was associated with tooth type (p < 0.001), root count (p < 0.001), and orifice distribution pattern (p < 0.001). Diverse RCMs were observed among mandibular primary molars. Clinicians should be aware that mandibular second primary molars, particularly those with ≥ 3 roots, or with trapezoidal or rectangular orifice distribution patterns, are at high risk for missed canals during pulpectomy, as they are likely to have four or more canals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.