ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Deep learning-based automated scanline localization in suprahyoid muscle ultrasound for quantitative dysphagia assessment.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ultrasound-based assessment of suprahyoid muscle (SHM) motion has emerged as a promising approach for evaluating dysphagia. However, quantitative analysis remains limited by operator-dependent scanline placement and variability in manual interpretation. This study proposes an integrated framework combining mathematical modeling, automated SHM segmentation, scanline determination, and deep learning-based analysis for objective dysphagia assessment. A total of 371 ultrasound images acquired from patients with normal, mild, and severe dysphagia were analyzed. Clinically relevant SHM-derived variables, including thickness, displacement, SHM Difference (Δ = D - T), and total duration, were incorporated into a mathematical interpretation framework. U-Net was employed for SHM segmentation and automatic scanline determination, and agreement with expert-selected scanlines was evaluated using median-based accuracy, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), mean pairwise absolute difference (MPAD), and population standard deviation (SDpop). In addition, five deep learning architectures (ResNet-101, Fast R-CNN, YOLO11, VGG-19, and U-Net) were compared for dysphagia severity classification. The proposed framework demonstrated high agreement with expert assessments. U-Net achieved an average intersection-over-union (IoU) of 0.9599 across the three major SHM components, indicating near-expert segmentation performance. Automated scanline determination achieved an overall agreement of 72.3% with expert consensus, while manual scanline placement exhibited relatively low interobserver reliability (ICC = 0.386). Among the evaluated classification models, Fast R-CNN achieved the highest performance with an F1-score of 0.993 and an inference time of 3.44 ms. Grad-CAM analysis further confirmed that model attention was concentrated on clinically relevant SHM regions. The proposed framework provides an objective and reproducible approach for ultrasound-based dysphagia assessment by integrating mathematical modeling with AI-driven segmentation and classification. Automated SHM localization and scanline determination reduce operator dependency while maintaining expert-level accuracy. These findings support the potential of AI-assisted ultrasound as a clinically applicable tool for standardized dysphagia evaluation and real-time decision support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42842086What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.