Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42842082›Full record

ArticlePlant foods for human nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2026

Nutritional Evaluation and Protein Quality Assessment of Green Peas (Pisum sativum L.) Treated with Different Cooking Methods.

Lucia Crysanthy Soedirga, Alphen Rianto, Nuri Arum Anugrahati, Intan Cidarbulan Matita, Florecita Meisy Natasya Sanaky

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plant foods for human nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lucia Crysanthy SoedirgaFood Technology Department, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universitas Pelita Harapan, Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang, Banten-Indonesia, Indonesia. lucia.soedirga@uph.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5756-7946
Alphen RiantoFood Technology Department, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universitas Pelita Harapan, Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang, Banten-Indonesia, Indonesia.
Nuri Arum AnugrahatiFood Technology Department, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universitas Pelita Harapan, Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang, Banten-Indonesia, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5353-5736
Intan Cidarbulan MatitaFood Technology Department, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universitas Pelita Harapan, Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang, Banten-Indonesia, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9178-213X
Florecita Meisy Natasya SanakyFood Technology Department, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universitas Pelita Harapan, Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang, Banten-Indonesia, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-3374-0374

Funding

Center for Research and Community Development (CRCD), Universitas Pelita Harapan, 364/LPPM-UPH/XII/2024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Green peas (Pisum sativum L.) are recognized as a sustainable source with protein content ranging from 23.1 to 30.9% on a dry basis. Data regarding the impact of household cooking methods on pea protein quality remain limited. Therefore, this study evaluated the effects of four cooking methods - steaming (S4), boiling (B4), slow cooking (SC1), and pressure cooking (PC30) - compared with a control (without cooking treatment) on the nutritional profile, including protein content and in vitro protein digestibility (IVPD). SC1 was identified as the selected method, producing 6.52 ± 0.43% protein (wet basis) and 30.89 ± 0.51% IVPD. Slow-cooked peas showed an increase in the concentrations of both essential and non-essential amino acids compared to the control. The Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS) of slow-cooked peas increased when compared to the control, except for sulfur-containing amino acids (SAAs) and aromatic amino acids (AAAs). Although the threonine concentration increased after slow cooking for 1 h, threonine remained the limiting amino acid in the cooked pea protein, with a DIAAS of 14.64 ± 0.04%, showing that even effective cooking could not overcome inherent threonine limitations. This study provides quantifiable benchmarks to support the nutritional security of plant-based diets under SDG 2 (Zero Hunger).

Indexed as

CookingDietary ProteinsNutritive ValuePea ProteinsPisum sativumAmino AcidsDigestionHot TemperatureHumansPlant ProteinsAmino AcidsDietary ProteinsPea ProteinsPlant ProteinsGreen peaLegume proteinProtein digestibilitySlow cookingSustainable crops

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.