ArticleProgress in orthodontics2026
Torque expression in directly printed and thermoformed clear aligners: a controlled in vitro biomechanical comparison of power ridge effects.
Article in Progress in orthodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTorque control of anterior teeth remains a major challenge in clear aligner therapy. Power ridges have been introduced to improve buccolingual root control; however, their biomechanical performance in directly printed aligners remains insufficiently investigated. The aim of this study was to compare the torque efficiency of power ridges in thermoformed and directly printed aligners. METHODOLOGY: A controlled in-vitro study was conducted using a standardised maxillary model requiring incisor torque correction. Four aligner groups were evaluated: Zendura Flex thermoformed aligners (Bay Materials LLC, USA) with (ZF-PR) and without (ZF-C) power ridges, and two directly printed aligners with power ridges fabricated from TA-28 (Graphy Inc., Seoul, South Korea) and DCA (LuxCreo Inc., Bellevue, WA, USA) resin materials. Power ridges were digitally positioned on the labial gingival third of the maxillary central incisors. Biomechanical testing was performed using the Orthodontic Measurement and Simulation System (OMSS) to assess torque expression, root displacement, and force-moment systems under controlled temperatures (25 °C and 37 °C).
resultsTorque expression demonstrated a clear material-dependent pattern. ZF-C, used as the baseline, showed moderate and consistent torque expression (38-39% of the programmed torque) across temperatures, with no significant temperature-dependent differences. DCA exhibited the highest torque expression, reaching 62% at 25 °C and 47% at 37 °C. ZF-PR showed intermediate performance (32-42%) with moderate temperature-related variation. TA-28 demonstrated the lowest torque expression (10-17%) with no significant temperature effect. Secondary outcomes supported these findings, with moment generation and displacement patterns correlating with torque expression, whereas force magnitude did not.
conclusionsTorque expression in clear aligner systems is primarily governed by material properties and thermomechanical behaviour. Design features alone cannot fully compensate for limitations in material performance. Effective torque delivery depends on the generation and transmission of an appropriate force-moment system rather than on force magnitude alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.