ReviewBiodegradation2026
Process modeling and optimization of biochar production: contemporary and emerging techniques for environmental engineering applications.
Review in Biodegradation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Numerous studies have investigated the production, characterization, and applications of biochar across diverse fields. However, a substantial gap remains in the literature regarding the optimization of biochar process parameters and the development of robust utilization models. Considering biochar as a promising tool for environmental remediation, the present study systematically examines process parameters and optimization techniques using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) framework. Scopus was used as the primary data source, covering publications from 2008 to 2025. A total of 86 studies met the eligibility criteria for this review. The design of experiments (DOE), multi-objective optimization approaches (MOO), and machine learning (AI/ML) models were found to be predominant methodologies employed in the selected studies. Response surface methodology (RSM), particularly central composite design (CCD) and box-Behnken design (BBD) was widely and robustly applied for biochar production optimization. However, the use of primary data-driven AI/ML models remains limited, and MOO approaches beyond the desirability function approach (DFA) were sparsely explored. The findings highlight the need for hybrid frameworks that integrate DoE with advanced AI/ML techniques, supported by multi-objective optimization and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods, as promising future research avenues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42842048What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.