Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42842031›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of biometeorology2026

Advancing grapevine phenology predictions: a comparison of regression-based statistical learning approach and conventional models in mediterranean environment.

Ali Didevarasl, Pierfrancesco Deiana, Donatella Spano, Jose M Costa Saura, Luca Mercenaro, Giovanni Nieddu, Antonio Trabucco

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of biometeorology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ali DidevaraslDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, 07100, SS, Italy. didehvarali@gmail.com.
Pierfrancesco DeianaDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, 07100, SS, Italy. pideiana@uniss.it.
Donatella SpanoDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, 07100, SS, Italy.
Jose M Costa SauraCMCC Foundation- Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Changes, Lecce, Italy.
Luca MercenaroDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, 07100, SS, Italy.
Giovanni NiedduDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, 07100, SS, Italy.
Antonio TrabuccoDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, 07100, SS, Italy.

Funding

CMCC ECS00000036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate conditions can significantly affect plant dormancy and growing season, impacting crop development and its productivity. Temperature is considered the primary driver of grapevine phenology, with endodormancy and ecodormancy largely regulated by chilling and forcing accumulations, respectively. Nevertheless, additional climatic factors, such as precipitation, radiation and atmospheric circulation patterns, may also contribute and regulate variability of different phenological phases. As hotspot of climate change, Mediterranean regions are witnessing negative compounding effects by enhanced warming and changes in precipitation patterns on crop systems and linked agro-industry. Among these, viticulture is a particularly relevant economic crop in Mediterranean regions. This research aims to assess some conventional phenological modeling approaches to project several phenological stages of grapevine in Sardinia (Italy), comparing the results to regression-based stepwise Statistical Learning that can potentially account for effect of several climate variables. Combined models (i.e. Chilling Hours-Growing Degree Hours) improve prediction of budburst phenological timing (RMSEs: 7 days) in relation to more complex models (i.e., PhenoFlex). The Growing Degree Days model was more accurate than complex phenological models in predicting blooming and veraison (RMSEs of 6 and 4 days, respectively). The regression-based statistical learning approach achieved phenological prediction performances comparable to the best of the conventional models (RMSEs: 4-7 days). Regression-based statistical learning approach was able to infer contribution of several climate variables on grapevine phenology, at a larger seasonal scale. Implementing both modeling approaches showed similar spatial patterns, except for budburst phase which indicated earlier timings over mountainous regions through regression-based statistical learning contrary to conventional model, highlighting the influence of maximum and minimum temperatures from previous year.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalVitisClimate ChangeItalyMediterranean RegionPredictive Learning ModelsRegression AnalysisSeasonsTemperatureCannonauGrapevineMediterraneanPhenological modelingPhenological phasesStatistical learning

Identifiers

PMID42842031
PMCPMC13645862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.