Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42842030›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2026

Applications of acellular dermal matrix in spine surgery: A systematic review.

Dong Hoon Kim, Jin-Young Kim, Jung-Woo Hur, Jae Taek Hong

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dong Hoon KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4422-2997
Jin-Young KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, 1021 Tongil-ro, Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul, 03312, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4896-8980
Jung-Woo HurDepartment of Neurosurgery, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, 1021 Tongil-ro, Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul, 03312, Republic of Korea. neurotique79@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2184-0044
Jae Taek HongDepartment of Neurosurgery, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, 1021 Tongil-ro, Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul, 03312, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6453-0439

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is a tissue-engineered biological scaffold widely adopted in plastic reconstructive surgery, yet its application in spine surgery remains largely underexplored. No prior systematic review has synthesized the available evidence. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus was performed from inception through 31 July 2026, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD420261326660). Studies were stratified a priori into three evidence tiers: direct spine surgery evidence, craniovertebral/neuraxis evidence, and indirect cranial evidence. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I and JBI checklists; certainty was rated using GRADE. Ten studies comprising 385 enrolled patients met inclusion criteria: 172 patients in seven studies providing direct spine surgery evidence, 13 patients in two craniovertebral/neuraxis studies, and 200 patients in one predominantly cranial duraplasty series. Five application categories were identified. The single comparative study-a propensity score-matched cohort of 108 patients undergoing ACDF-reported lower Swallowing Impairment Scores at the pre-specified three-month endpoint (0.26 ± 0.16 vs. 0.68 ± 0.27, p = 0.01, significant after Bonferroni correction), although the observed difference (Δ = 0.42) fell below the suggested minimal clinically important difference, and adhesion scores did not differ between groups. All remaining studies were uncontrolled. GRADE certainty was very low across all outcomes. Efficacy of ADM in spine surgery cannot be determined from the current evidence base. Reported adverse events were infrequent, but ascertainment was neither standardized nor prospective, and these data are insufficient to establish safety. Findings are product- and indication-specific and should not be generalized across ADM formulations or clinical applications.

Indexed as

Acellular DermisNeurosurgical ProceduresSpinal DiseasesSpineHumansPlastic Surgery ProceduresAcellular dermal matrixAnterior cervical discectomy and fusionAnti-adhesionDural repairSpine surgerySystematic review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.