SynthesisLangenbeck's archives of surgery2026
Clinical outcomes of early versus standard liver transplantation in patients with alcohol-related liver disease: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA 6-month abstinence period before listing patients with alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) for liver transplantation (LT) is the current standard practice at many transplant centers worldwide. Its prognostic validity is, however, debated because it has not been prospectively validated, and because many ALD patients do not survive long enough to make it onto the waitlist.
methodsA meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the guidelines put forth by Cochrane and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Three databases (PubMed/Medline, Scopus and Cochrane Library) were searched to identify studies comparing early (eLT) and standard LT (sLT).
resultsTwelve studies comparing eLT and sLT for ALD were included, encompassing 2323 patients with ALD. Mortality [Risk ratio (RR) = 0.94, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.73-1.22] and patient survival [Hazard Ratio (HR) = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.83-1.45] did not differ significantly between eLT and sLT. Any alcohol relapse was more frequent following eLT but did not reach significance in the primary analysis (RR = 1.37, 95%CI: 0.95-2.00). This association became statistically significant on leave-one-out and subgroup analyses. Early LT patients had a higher risk of acute graft rejection (RR = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.98-1.52) but comparable graft loss (RR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.74-1.27). Post-operative risk of infection did not differ significantly (RR = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.80-1.77), but eLT was associated with longer hospitalization [Mean Difference (MD) = 5.24 days, 95% CI: 0.15-10.33].
conclusionsEarly LT offers survival similar to sLT and is a reasonable option when medical therapy fails. However, the equivocal evidence of higher morbidity and alcohol relapse, and the longer hospitalization, support careful multidisciplinary selection and close post-transplant surveillance, particularly among recipients with alcohol-related hepatitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.