Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42841986›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2026

Training effects in oculography in multiple sclerosis patients: a one-year longitudinal study.

Sam N Hof, Pam C G Molenaar, Ka Hoo Lam, Daan J de Jong, Joep Killestein, Laurentius J van Rijn, Axel Petzold, Bernard M J Uitdehaag

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sam N HofMS Center and Neuro-ophthalmology Expertise Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands. s.n.hof@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0453-6449
Pam C G MolenaarMS Center and Neuro-ophthalmology Expertise Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands.
Ka Hoo LamMS Center and Neuro-ophthalmology Expertise Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands.
Daan J de JongMS Center and Neuro-ophthalmology Expertise Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands.
Joep KillesteinMS Center and Neuro-ophthalmology Expertise Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands.
Laurentius J van RijnNeuro-ophthalmology Expertise Center Amsterdam, Ophthalmology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Axel PetzoldMoorfields Eye Hospital, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Bernard M J UitdehaagMS Center and Neuro-ophthalmology Expertise Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands.

Funding

PPP Allowance made available by Health Holland, Top Sector Life Sciences and Health LSHM16060-SGFStichting MS Research 16-946 MS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLongitudinal quantitative data on eye movement abnormalities in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) are scarce, and the impact of repeated oculomotor testing on these measures is unknown. We aimed to use infrared oculography to characterise one-year changes in oculomotor metrics in PwMS and to determine whether frequent exposure to eye movement tasks influences these measurements.

methodsAt baseline, 3- and 12 months 86 PwMS and 22 healthy controls (HCs, baseline, and 3 months only) were prospectively assessed using infrared oculography (DEMoNS protocol), including fixation, pro-saccades, express-saccades, anti-saccades, and double-step saccades. Participants received separate smartphone-based eye-tracking tasks, daily in the first month and weekly up to 12 months.

resultsAt baseline PwMS showed increased 15° latency (+ 18ms, P = 0.029) and versional dysconjugacy (index + 0.08, P = 0.028) on pro-saccades compared to HCs. At 12 months PwMS showed increased performance in anti-saccades (correct responses + 9%, P < 0.001) and double-step saccades (correct responses + 8%, P < 0.001; error - 0.39°, P < 0.001). Changes in double-step saccade accuracy correlated with disability (std. β = 0.28, P = 0.02). Changes in anti-saccade performance correlated with cognitive processing speed (std. β = 0.23, P = 0.049) and verbal memory (std. β = 0.30, P = 0.01).

conclusionsFrequent oculomotor tasks may induce training effects in complex oculography tasks, such as anti-saccades and double-step saccades. Simple oculomotor tasks, such as prosaccades and parameters related to internuclear ophthalmoplegia, seem to be relatively unaffected by training effects. These effects should be considered in MS trials using oculomotor outcomes.

Indexed as

Eye-trackingOculographyOculomotorSaccadesTraining effectsVisual rehabilitation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.