ArticleUlusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES2026
Cumulative soft-sign burden is associated with clinically significant injury in hemodynamically stable penetrating neck trauma.
Article in Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRisk stratification remains challenging in hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating neck trauma and no hard signs. We evaluated the association between cumulative soft-sign burden and clinically significant injury (CSI) requiring therapeutic intervention.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included adults with penetrating neck trauma who were hemodynamically stable, had no hard signs, and underwent cervical computed tomography angiography (CTA). CSI was defined as a vascular or aerodigestive injury requiring therapeutic surgical or endovascular intervention. Soft-sign count was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis and logistic regression.
resultsOf 109 patients, 33 (30.3%) had CSI. The median soft-sign count was higher among patients undergoing therapeutic surgery (2 vs. 1; p<0.001). Soft-sign count showed good discrimination for CSI (AUC, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.71-0.90). A threshold of ≥1 soft sign yielded 93.9% sensitivity and a 91.7% negative predictive value, whereas ≥2 soft signs yielded 89.5% specificity and a 73.3% positive predictive value. Each additional soft sign was independently associated with higher odds of CSI (adjusted OR, 4.83; 95% CI, 2.42-9.64; p<0.001). Gunshot mechanism was also strongly associated with CSI (OR, 10.58; 95% CI, 2.68-41.75).
conclusionIncreasing soft-sign burden was strongly associated with CSI. The absence of soft signs reduced but did not eliminate the risk, whereas multiple soft signs identified a higher-risk group. Soft-sign count may support imaging prioritization and early surgical consultation but should not replace CTA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.