SynthesisCardiology journal2026
One-time versus staged multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Cardiology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe optimal revascularization strategy for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) and multivessel disease remains uncertain. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of one-time versus staged multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on clinical outcomes. MATERIAL AND
methodsPubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies comparing one-time and staged PCI in NSTE-ACS patients with multivessel disease from January 1, 2000 to June 4, 2026. Study quality was assessed, data were extracted independently by two reviewers, and pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using R software and the meta package.
resultsTen studies involving 6,749 patients (4,235 one-time PCI; 2,514 staged PCI) were included. In randomized trials, one-time PCI significantly reduced repeat revascularization (RR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.51-0.98, p = 0.037) versus staged PCI, with no differences in mortality or recurrent myocardial infarction. Cohort studies and the pooled analysis showed no significant differences across outcomes.
conclusionsFor NSTE-ACS patients with multivessel disease, multivessel revascularization in a single procedure may reduce repeat revascularization compared with staged PCI, but the evidence remains limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.