ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2026
Effect of Visual Crowding on Quality of Life in Glaucoma Patients.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the association between visual crowding and vision-related quality of life (QoL) in patients with glaucoma. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 50 patients diagnosed with POAG. Visual crowding was quantified by measuring the critical spacing (Scritical). The Scritical was assessed in each visual field quadrant. For each eye, a global Scritical was calculated as the mean of the eligible quadrant-specific values. Vision-related QoL was assessed using the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25), scored using Rasch analysis. Associations between the Scritical and the NEI VFQ-25 Rasch-calibrated scores were examined using generalized estimating equations, with multivariable models adjusted for age and standard automated perimetry 24-2 mean deviation. Results: Among 50 patients with POAG (93 eyes; mean age, 67.9 ± 9.2 years), the mean Rasch-calibrated NEI VFQ-25 score was 59.9 ± 18.8. In univariable analyses, each 1-degree increase in the better-eye global Scritical was associated with a 5.69-point lower NEI VFQ-25 score (95% confidence interval, -10.43 to -0.96; P = 0.018), and each 1-degree increase in the worse-eye Scritical was associated with a 2.23-point lower score (95% confidence interval, -4.38 to -0.08; P = 0.042). In multivariable analysis adjusting for age and standard automated perimetry mean deviation, the better-eye Scritical remained independently associated with a worse QoL (-5.02 points per degree; 95% confidence interval, -9.59 to -0.45; P = 0.031). Conclusions: Visual crowding is independently associated with worse vision-related QoL in patients with glaucoma, even after adjustment for standard perimetric loss. These findings suggest that visual crowding captures clinically meaningful aspects of visual dysfunction beyond conventional perimetry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.