Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42841439›Full record

ArticleNursing in critical care2026

Thirst in Patients With Advanced Chronic Heart Failure Waiting for a Heart Transplantation: A Mixed Methods Study of Patients' and Nurses' Experiences.

Franziska Wefer, Lars Krüger, Stella Calo, Ralph Möhler, Martin Nikolaus Dichter, Andrea Mühring, Jan Gummert, Sascha Köpke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing in critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Franziska WeferCare Development, Care Directorate, Ruhr University Bochum, Heart and Diabetes Center NRW, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9405-3143
Lars KrügerProject and Knowledge Management/Care Development Intensive Care, Care Directorate, Ruhr University Bochum, Heart and Diabetes Center NRW, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4234-0022
Stella CaloInstitute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf.
Ralph MöhlerInstitute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8637-7818
Martin Nikolaus DichterFaculty of Medicine & University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Nursing Science, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5094-3723
Andrea MühringCenter for Heart Failure, Care Directorate, Ruhr University Bochum, Heart and Diabetes Center NRW, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
Jan GummertDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Ruhr University Bochum, Heart and Diabetes Center NRW, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6956-9110
Sascha KöpkeFaculty of Medicine & University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Nursing Science, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4106-4919

Funding

Heart and Diabetes Center NRW, Ruhr University BochumInstitute of Nursing Science, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospitalised patients with advanced chronic heart failure (CHF) waiting for transplantation may experience increased thirst due to their critical illness and therapy-related requirements. The perspective of patients and nurses is important for developing a nurse-based counselling intervention to reduce thirst.

aimsTo identify patients' and nurses' experiences and perceptions of thirst, as well as their information needs and preferences on information dissemination. STUDY

designThis convergent mixed methods study used semi-structured interviews with patients, focus groups and a survey with nurses in Germany. We analysed the qualitative data using content analysis and the quantitative data descriptively. We compared the results of both methodological approaches and summarized the data as meta-inferences. RESULTS &

findingsWe conducted 10 interviews with patients on intensive care units, intermediate care units and general wards during their waiting time for transplantation, two focus groups with, respectively, five nurses and a survey with 59 nurses caring for these patients. Analyses resulted in five common categories: experiences of thirst, factors that influence thirst, assessment of thirst, dealing with thirst and information about thirst. Patients' experiences with thirst differ markedly, ranging from mild to severe thirst, and they use various strategies to deal with thirst. Nurses consider thirst relevant for patients and nursing care. Strategies used in practice for assessment of thirst are very heterogeneous. In the survey, less than half of the nurses claimed to regularly assess patients' thirst. Nurses and patients wish to receive individual information and counselling.

conclusionsThirst in hospitalised patients with advanced CHF waiting for transplantation can be severe and is experienced differently. Standardised procedures for assessing and managing thirst on the ward seem essential to address patients' needs and preferences. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Patients and nurses express a need for professional counselling on managing thirst in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Heart FailureHeart TransplantationThirstAdultAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelChronic DiseaseFemaleFocus GroupsGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchcounsellingheart failuremixed methodsnursing assessmentthirst

Identifiers

PMID42841439
PMCPMC13643929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.