ArticleDevelopmental science2026
The Evolution of Finger Counting Strategies in Addition: A Three-Year Longitudinal Study in Young Children.
Article in Developmental science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, the developmental trajectory of children's finger-based strategies for addition is described for the first time using a longitudinal design involving 207 children aged 4 ½ at the first testing point. Children were observed individually twice a year over a three-year period. The trajectory typically followed by children corresponds to the one theoretically described in the literature as supporting the gradual internalization of finger strategies and leading to the complete mentalization of the solving process. More precisely, children progressed from a modeling strategy in which each operand of an addition is represented on the fingers of each hand, through a concrete counting-on strategy, in which both operands are still represented but enumerated in a single continuous process, to a counting-on strategy, in which only one operand is kept in mind while the other is tracked on fingers. The frequent use of the concrete counting-on strategy between modeling and counting-on strategies supports Baroody's proposition that it serves as a transitional step between concrete and more abstract forms of numerical representation. However, the concrete counting-on strategy was associated with poor addition performance, suggesting that it corresponds to a reconstructive stage in which children gain new insights about numbers but lack the cognitive resources to fully capitalize on them. Overall, this study provides the first detailed description of the evolution of finger-based strategies toward the internalization of the addition solving process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.