ArticlePain research & management2026
Understanding the Evidence-to-Practice Gap in Persistent Pain Management.
Article in Pain research & management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDespite advances in pain science education, evidence-based approaches to chronic pain are not consistently translated into physical therapy practice. Physical therapist (PT) clinical instructors (CIs) occupy a unique role as both clinicians and mentors of future practitioners. This study examined PT CIs' pain knowledge, pain-related beliefs, confidence, and self-reported use of pain neuroscience education (PNE) and explored perceived barriers to implementing evidence-informed persistent pain management and preparing students to care for individuals with persistent pain.
methodsThis convergent mixed-methods study used an anonymous online survey to collect quantitative and qualitative data from 30 PT CIs. Quantitative measures assessed pain neurophysiology knowledge, pain-related beliefs, pain care confidence, and reported use of PNE. Open-ended responses explored challenges in chronic pain management and student mentorship. Quantitative data were summarized descriptively, qualitative responses were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis, and findings were integrated through SCT to examine factors contributing to the evidence-to-practice gap.
resultsParticipants demonstrated high pain care confidence, moderate-to-high pain neurophysiology knowledge, low disability-oriented beliefs, and moderate use of PNE. Qualitative themes identified challenges in pain communication, management of complex presentations, and patient engagement that are compounded by clinical constraints. CIs also perceived that students possessed foundational pain knowledge but struggled to apply it through communication, treatment progression, and PNE. Integrated findings revealed a mismatch between knowledge and confidence and the application of biopsychosocial pain management.
conclusionThe evidence-to-practice gap in chronic pain management may reflect more than inadequate pain knowledge. While CIs reported strong confidence and generally contemporary beliefs, they continued to experience difficulty with communication, adaptability, patient engagement, and implementation within constrained clinical environments. Strategies to improve pain management should therefore extend beyond knowledge acquisition and include applied communication training, context-sensitive clinical decision-making, and support for clinicians who model pain care for future PTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.