ReviewDementia & neuropsychologia2026
Prior COVID-19 vaccination and cognitive outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 infection: a mini-review.
Review in Dementia & neuropsychologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
COVID-19 infection has been frequently associated with cognitive deficits that persist for months after the acute phase, but the impact of vaccination on preventing these deficits remains uncertain. Evidence suggests that immunization reduces the incidence and severity of post-COVID symptoms, yet few studies have evaluated its influence on cognition using objective measures. To address this gap, a mini-review was conducted using a systematic search strategy, following PRISMA recommendations where applicable, with a protocol registered in PROSPERO (CRD42025636772). Searches were carried out in the PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus databases, and eligible studies were those that assessed cognition using objective measures and compared vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals at the time of infection. A total of 1,796 records were identified, of which only five met the inclusion criteria. The included studies varied considerably in cognitive assessment tools, study designs, and sample sizes. Four of the five studies found no association between prior vaccination and cognitive deficits, whereas the only study that identified a subtle difference among individuals who had received at least two doses of the vaccine had a substantially larger sample than all the others combined. Methodological inconsistencies in cognitive assessment, variability in the definitions of vaccination status, and the lack of stratification by specific cognitive domains limit the interpretation of the current findings. Although vaccination may play a role in protecting against cognitive deficits following COVID-19 infection, the evidence remains limited and inconclusive. Further studies with standardized definitions of vaccination status and comprehensive objective assessments are needed to clarify this relationship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.