Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42841111›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Evaluating the Efficacy of Brensocatib in Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis.

Alan Mathew, Hannah Anwar

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alan MathewInternal Medicine, Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basildon, GBR.
Hannah AnwarMedical Education, Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basildon, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bronchiectasis is a widely recognised chronic respiratory illness classified in severity by frequency of exacerbations within the past year, percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (%FEV1), previous hospital admissions and radiological severity, among other factors. The physiological process is understood to be driven by neutrophilic inflammation and subsequent bronchial wall destruction and dilatation. Brensocatib has emerged as a novel adjunct in the management of chronic bronchiectasis as a dipeptidyl peptidase-1 inhibitor, directly targeting the inflammatory process. The editorial aims to review the mechanism of action of brensocatib, current literature surrounding its efficacy and side effect profile, and potential implications of a wider rollout of the medication to the adult UK population. Whilst the current literature does support a modest reduction in the frequency of exacerbations for patients who trialled bresnocatib, there is a large amount of uncertainty regarding long-term safety, implementation into the current regime, and cost-effectiveness.

Indexed as

brensocatibdpp-inhibitorsnon-cf bronchiectasispolypharmacyreview of the literature

Identifiers

PMID42841111
PMCPMC13641721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.