Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42841107›Full record

ReviewDementia & neuropsychologia2026

Episodic memory in aging: neurocognitive bases and clinical implications of the distinction between hippocampal and frontal patterns.

Pedro Donizetti de Oliveira

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dementia & neuropsychologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Pedro Donizetti de OliveiraClínica Neuroavaliação e Neuroeducação, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6841-9233

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Episodic memory is one of the cognitive domains most vulnerable to age-related changes and the early stages of neurodegenerative syndromes. In Brazilian clinical practice, however, the interpretation of memory performance frequently remains restricted to the quantitative analysis of delayed recall, without adequate consideration of the underlying neurocognitive mechanisms. This study aimed to critically examine the neurobiological foundations of the distinction between hippocampal consolidation deficits and executive retrieval impairments mediated by prefrontal circuits, discussing their diagnostic and gerontological implications. This integrative narrative review is grounded in recent national and international literature (2019-2024) and integrates evidence from neuroimaging, theoretical models of memory, and clinical data relevant to aging. Differentiating hippocampal consolidation deficits from executive retrieval impairments, integrated with the assessment of functional capacity, is proposed as a clinically actionable, mechanism-based framework for improving diagnostic accuracy in aging within heterogeneous sociocultural contexts such as Brazil.

Indexed as

AgingCognitive DysfunctionExecutive FunctionHippocampusMemory, Episodic

Identifiers

PMID42841107
PMCPMC13641760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.