ArticleCase reports in dentistry2026
Maxillary Expansion With C-Expander Using Digital Planning and CBCT-Based Surgical Guidance: A Case Report.
Article in Case reports in dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This clinical case report describes the clinical management of a patient with a transverse maxillary deficiency treated with a C-expander. The objective is to present the diagnosis, tomographic planning, implantation, and postexpansion evolution. The patient presented with typical characteristics of a transverse maxillary deficiency, with a maxillomandibular discrepancy of 6.8 mm; the insertion of miniscrews was planned using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scanning with BlueSky Plan 4 software. A surgical guide was fabricated, and the C-expander was installed; activation was performed progressively under weekly clinical monitoring. Another CBCT scan was performed after the expansion. Follow-up CT showed transverse improvement with a nearly parallel opening pattern of the median palatine suture of approximately 6.5 mm on the axial view. Dentoalveolarly, the upper intermolar distance increased by 7.1 mm and the lower by 1 mm. Intermolar angulation increased by 2° in the upper arch and 5° in the lower arch; overjet increased by 1 mm and overbite decreased by 15%. Furthermore, the 3D frontal facial reconstruction revealed an increase in the intercanthal distance of 0.3 mm, an increase in the nasal interalar distance of 3.5 mm, and an increase in the nasal base width of 4.4 mm. In conclusion, maxillary expansion using a digitally guided C-expander successfully achieved separation of the midpalatal suture in this patient, with limited dental and facial effects during the immediate postexpansion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.