ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2026
Organelle-Targeted Nanocarriers for Cancer Therapy: Design Principles, Intracellular Trafficking, and Translational Barriers in Precision Drug Delivery.
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clinical translation of cancer nanomedicine remains constrained by inefficient intracellular delivery, poor subcellular specificity, and limited tumor accumulation, highlighting the need for more precise drug delivery strategies. Organelle-targeted nanocarriers have emerged as a promising platform for enhancing therapeutic efficacy by directing drugs to specific intracellular compartments, including the nucleus, mitochondria, lysosomes, and endoplasmic reticulum. However, the design principles governing efficient organelle-specific delivery and the barriers limiting clinical translation remain incompletely understood. This review provides a mechanistic framework linking nanoparticle physicochemical properties-including size, surface charge, ligand functionalization, and stimuli responsiveness to intracellular trafficking, organelle targeting, and therapeutic performance. We critically discuss the biological barriers encountered during delivery, including cellular uptake, endosomal escape, cytosolic transport, and organelle membrane penetration, together with current engineering strategies to overcome these challenges. Organelle-specific targeting approaches are comparatively evaluated to highlight their therapeutic advantages, limitations, and suitable clinical applications. Beyond summarizing recent advances, this review examines the major translational hurdles that impede clinical implementation, including non-specific biodistribution, manufacturing scalability, regulatory challenges, and the lack of standardized preclinical evaluation models. Emerging solutions such as hierarchical targeting, charge-reversal systems, size-transformable nanocarriers, and multifunctional theranostic platforms are discussed as strategies to improve clinical feasibility. Finally, we propose practical design guidelines and future research priorities that integrate nanomaterial engineering, predictive biological models, and scalable manufacturing to facilitate the development of clinically translatable organelle-targeted nanomedicines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.