Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42840939›Full record

ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2026

Postpartum blood pressure trends and time in target range during remote blood pressure monitoring.

Sarah Shim, Katelyn M Tessier, Sarah A Wernimont, Tiffany Corlin, Jessica L Gottula, Martina Burn, Bethany A Sabol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah ShimDepartment of Obstetrics Gynecology and Women's Health University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2329-2399
Katelyn M TessierBiostatistics Core Masonic Cancer Center University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5513-583X
Sarah A WernimontDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Women's Health University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6894-7837
Tiffany CorlinDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Women's Health University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3971-3492
Jessica L GottulaDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Women's Health University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4685-7689
Martina BurnDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Women's Health University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8797-6871
Bethany A SabolDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Women's Health University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3908-7046

Funding

Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Timothy C. Hallstrom · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UM1TR004405 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Bruce R Blazar, Damien A Fair · 2023 to 2026
$30.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004405NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Postpartum remote blood pressure monitoring (RBPM) programs have emerged as an important adjunct to the management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP). These programs have demonstrated robust patient participation and satisfaction with reduced readmissions and severe maternal morbidity. Despite this, data describing blood pressure (BP) trends throughout program participation and across different antihypertensive regimens remain limited. We sought to evaluate BP trends and time in target range (TTR) during our 6-week RBPM program. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of postpartum individuals participating in an RBPM program from November 2023 through December 2024. This program utilizes a standardized nurse (RN)-driven protocol for antihypertensive medication initiation and titration to achieve a goal BP of <140/90 mmHg. Target range was defined as SBP (systolic BP) 100-139 mmHg and DBP (diastolic BP) 60-89 mmHg. The primary outcomes were BP trend and TTR throughout program participation stratified by antihypertensive medication at discharge. Results: The cohort included 465 individuals. Mean BPs were <140/90 mmHg for all groups for each program week. Most participants were within the target range throughout with TTR between 80.3% and 90.4%. Of participants, 175 (81.4%) were prescribed nifedipine monotherapy and 40 (18.6%) labetalol monotherapy. Mean BP trends were within goal for both groups; however, those discharged with nifedipine spent more TTR (nifedipine 87.5% vs. labetalol 80.3%, Conclusion: Postpartum RBPM is an important tool for postpartum care. Utilization of a standardized RN-driven protocol for antihypertensive medication initiation and titration can result in optimal BP management irrespective of medication regimen at discharge. These data suggest that nifedipine may be associated with more rapid and sustained achievement of target BPs throughout 6 weeks postpartum compared to labetalol.

Indexed as

hypertensionhypertensive disorder of pregnancymaternal morbiditypostpartumpreeclampsiaremote blood pressure monitoring

Identifiers

PMID42840939
PMCPMC13640052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.