ArticleRoyal Society open science2026
On the potential for crop yield increases to spare land: the role of rebound effects.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This essay discusses the economic mechanisms determining when yield growth spares land and when it drives expansion. The source of growth matters: technical change raises output with a fixed set of inputs, lowering production costs, whereas intensification requires more inputs and, unless those inputs are themselves more productive, raises costs. Because lower costs translate into lower prices, the outcome turns on how consumption responds. Where demand is inelastic, so that consumption changes less than proportionally to price, productivity gains lower farm profits and spare land, although rebound effects mean sparing is rarely complete. Where demand is elastic, gains raise profitability and cultivated area expands if land is available (backfire or Jevons effect). Farmers in agricultural frontiers supplying large domestic and international markets face elastic demand, making such regions prone to backfire. Globally, however, demand for agricultural output has been historically inelastic. This fact, combined with vigorous growth in global agricultural productivity, has resulted in net global land sparing. A slowdown in total factor productivity growth over the last decade and a half threatens these gains. Sustaining this outcome requires renewed investment in agricultural research and development, and policies that constrain frontier expansion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.