ArticleStrategies in trauma and limb reconstruction
Rehabilitation Following External Fixation for Lower Limb Trauma: A Service Evaluation Mapping the Gaps in Practice and Evidence.
Article in Strategies in trauma and limb reconstruction. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Definitive external fixation is commonly used in the management of complex lower limb fractures. Holistic pre- and post-operative rehabilitation is considered essential; however, rehabilitation practices vary considerably, with limited supporting evidence and no validated outcome measures for this population. Aim: To describe rehabilitation provision for adults with lower limb injuries managed with definitive external fixation at a single NHS Trust, with secondary evaluation of post-operative mobility outcomes, patient demographics, and exploratory factors associated with return to baseline mobility. Materials and methods: A retrospective, single-site, service evaluation was conducted including adult patients treated with definitive external fixation between 2022 and 2025. Descriptive statistics summarised the data and univariate analyses explored factors associated with return to baseline mobility. Results: Seventy-four patients were included, with a median age of 46 years. Fifty-three percent regained baseline mobility post-operatively. Rehabilitation showed poor compliance with national guidelines across multiple phases of recovery. Few individual rehabilitation variables were associated with return to baseline mobility in univariate analysis. Conclusion: This study provides descriptive evidence regarding rehabilitation provision, patient characteristics, and mobility recovery following definitive external fixation at a single NHS Trust. Findings highlight variation in rehabilitation delivery, poor compliance with national guidelines, and ongoing uncertainty regarding optimal rehabilitation pathways for this patient population. Clinical significance: These findings highlight the need for prospective, multicentre research to evaluate rehabilitation pathways, develop standardised outcome measures, and strengthen the evidence base for rehabilitation following definitive external fixation. Future research should capture acute and long-term recovery and include functional, psychological, and socioeconomic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.