ArticleStrategies in trauma and limb reconstruction
Feasibility of Virtual Reality Immersion in Reducing Pain and Anxiety during External Fixator Care Procedures.
Article in Strategies in trauma and limb reconstruction. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: External fixator care after limb reconstruction often involves pin-site cleaning and frame adjustments that can be painful and anxiety-provoking, particularly for paediatric patients. Virtual reality (VR) immersion may support procedural coping. This feasibility study evaluated the practicality and tolerability of VR during fixator care and explored pain and anxiety trends. Patients and methods: A prospective, randomised feasibility study enrolled 29 patients aged 5-21 years undergoing limb lengthening or reconstruction with external fixators. Participants were randomised to 'VR first' or 'no-VR first' groups and attended four postoperative visits, alternating between visits with and without VR using Aqua VR (KindVR® platform). Pain and anxiety were assessed before, during, and after each procedure using Wong-Baker FACES and Children's Fear Scale (CFS). Parent proxy and provider assessments were collected using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Parent Proxy, Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC), and CFS. Results: Twenty-nine participants (16 male, 13 female; mean age, 14.5 ± 3.1 years) completed the study. Median pin sites numbered 7 (range, 7-14). Virtual reality was feasible and tolerated during fixator care. Patient-reported pain scores were similar between VR and non-VR visits. Virtual reality visits showed a trend toward lower anxiety, although differences were not statistically significant. Patients exposed to VR first showed more consistent decreases in pain and anxiety across subsequent visits, suggesting possible carryover. Conclusion: Virtual reality immersion during fixator care appears feasible and well tolerated in paediatric and adolescent patients. Observed trends suggest potential benefit for anxiety reduction, particularly with early VR exposure; however, larger studies are needed to evaluate clinical efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.