Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42840852›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2026

Benchmarking hyperparameter optimization strategies for crop genomic prediction.

Huanping Xu, Yaoqi Wang, Yuting Ma, Hao Wang, Yongsheng Cao, Shen Yan, Jing Li, Yanjie Zhang, Yanqing Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Huanping XuState Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yaoqi WangHebei Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology, College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Hebei Normal University of Science and Technology, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, China.
Yuting MaHebei Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology, College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Hebei Normal University of Science and Technology, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, China.
Hao WangTobacco Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Yongsheng CaoState Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Shen YanState Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jing LiResearch Institute of Pomology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crops Germplasm Resources Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Xingcheng, China.
Yanjie ZhangResearch Institute of Pomology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crops Germplasm Resources Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Xingcheng, China.
Yanqing ChenState Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic prediction has become an important approach for accelerating crop breeding by using genome-wide marker information to predict complex traits. However, the performance of genomic prediction models is influenced not only by model selection but also by hyperparameter optimization strategies, which have received limited attention in crop genomic prediction studies. Based on four crop datasets, including maize, rice, wheat, and foxtail millet, we evaluated the prediction performance and computational efficiency of six representative genomic prediction models under four hyperparameter optimization strategies. The results showed that the optimal optimization strategy was jointly affected by crop species, target traits, and model types, and no single strategy consistently performed best across all scenarios. Bayesian optimization showed good prediction stability and achieved high prediction accuracy for most traits and models, especially in the rice and wheat datasets. Grid search and random search also showed strong competitiveness in some datasets. In contrast, although halving search reduced computational cost, it showed lower prediction stability in some cases. Our study highlights the important role of hyperparameter optimization in genomic prediction and provides a useful reference for selecting efficient optimization strategies in crop breeding applications.

Indexed as

crop breedinggenomic predictionhyperparameter optimizationmachine learningplant genomics

Identifiers

PMID42840852
PMCPMC13641739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.