ReviewJournal of experimental orthopaedics2026
Oral contraceptive use and anterior cruciate ligament injury or reconstruction in women: A systematic review and meta-analysis of very low-certainty evidence.
Review in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To determine whether oral contraceptive use is associated with anterior cruciate ligament injury or reconstruction in women and to examine whether associations vary according to age, contraceptive formulation, duration of use and outcome definition. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) were searched through 31 July 2026 (LILACS rerun with multilingual terms on 16 September 2026). Comparative observational studies were meta-analysed. The primary analysis pooled adjusted or matched odds ratios (ORs) for reconstruction or operatively treated injury using random-effects restricted maximum-likelihood models with Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman confidence intervals (CIs). Risk of bias was assessed with risk of bias in nonrandomised studies of exposures and certainty with grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation. Results: Ten studies were included; seven were meta-analysed. The primary analysis (four studies) showed no clear association (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.77-1.02; Conclusions: The primary adjusted or matched analysis did not establish a clear association between oral contraceptive use and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction or operatively treated injury; substantial heterogeneity, residual confounding and very low certainty of evidence preclude causal interpretation. Current evidence does not support initiating or selecting oral contraceptives for anterior cruciate ligament injury prevention. Well-designed prospective studies with standardised exposure and outcome definitions are needed. Level of Evidence: Level IV, systematic review of observational studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.