ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2026
An interactive virtual dosimetrist for adjusting radiotherapy dose quality.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Effective education in radiotherapy plan quality review requires exposure to treatment plans of varying quality and opportunities for plan improvements. However, the current clinic-based paradigm does not fully support these needs. Trainees often review limited numbers of diverse treatment plans and are not fully exposed to the planning decisions essential for developing strong evaluation skills. Materials and Methods: To address these challenges, we developed "Virtual Dosimetrist" models that generate and modify radiotherapy dose distributions through language conditioning, similar to communicating with a planner during plan review. This enables creation of diverse suboptimal examples and real-time, language-guided refinement. Results: The models modify dose distributions following language directives, allowing the generation of lower-quality examples and subsequent improvement. Dose predictions were produced quickly and without reliance on a planning system, enabling interactive adjustment that mirrors the clinical review-edit cycle. For the 11 patients in the test set, good control over the extent and magnitude of dose changes across 17 OOIs, together with robustness to variations in the language directives, was observed. When comparing to dose originating from a TPS, median RMSE was 52 cGy across all dose-level comparisons and 98% of predictions met the prespecified equivalence criterion of RMSE Conclusions: This work is the first to combine deep learning-based dose prediction with natural language processing specifically designed to support the language-conditioned generation of suboptimal dose distributions and their improvement. The framework could be used as a foundation for educational applications, such as replicating plan quality review in an interactive environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.