ReviewFrontiers in public health2026
Nurse-led pathways for loneliness and social isolation in older adults: a narrative review of assessment, relational mechanisms, and implementation.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Loneliness and social isolation in later life are major public health concerns that can compromise emotional wellbeing, participation, function, quality of life, and healthy aging. Intervention effects nevertheless remain heterogeneous and difficult to translate into routine services. This narrative review addresses a specific gap left by modality-based syntheses: how nursing assessment, relational work, and service implementation can be assembled into an accountable pathway from detection to sustained connection. A PubMed/MEDLINE search through 19 June 2026 was supplemented by focused publisher-record and citation-chain verification. Evidence was classified as nurse-led, nurse-delivered or supervised, transferable mechanism evidence, or implementation evidence. Direct nursing-role evidence remains limited by small samples, multicomponent interventions, inconsistent allocation and blinding, restricted populations, and short follow-up. Quantitative syntheses show average benefit but substantial between-study heterogeneity and possible small-study effects. We therefore propose a six-stage, review-derived pathway-detect and invite; differentiate and formulate; define a valued outcome; match and prepare; connect and verify; and review and adapt-with a separate failure-repair trigger rather than a seventh stage. The nursing contribution is described as clinical-relational integration: linking clinical assessment to the practical and interpersonal work required for an older adult to enter, test, and sustain a meaningful relationship or role. The pathway is a clinical heuristic, not a validated decision rule. Future studies should use hybrid effectiveness-implementation designs, report first-contact completion using an explicit denominator, assess relational harms, and examine equity and durability across settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.