Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42840817›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2026

Nurse-led pathways for loneliness and social isolation in older adults: a narrative review of assessment, relational mechanisms, and implementation.

Xiaoxin Sun, Esteve Adrian Z Estiva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiaoxin SunSchool of Nursing, Philippine Women's University, Manila, Philippines.
Esteve Adrian Z EstivaSchool of Nursing, Philippine Women's University, Manila, Philippines.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loneliness and social isolation in later life are major public health concerns that can compromise emotional wellbeing, participation, function, quality of life, and healthy aging. Intervention effects nevertheless remain heterogeneous and difficult to translate into routine services. This narrative review addresses a specific gap left by modality-based syntheses: how nursing assessment, relational work, and service implementation can be assembled into an accountable pathway from detection to sustained connection. A PubMed/MEDLINE search through 19 June 2026 was supplemented by focused publisher-record and citation-chain verification. Evidence was classified as nurse-led, nurse-delivered or supervised, transferable mechanism evidence, or implementation evidence. Direct nursing-role evidence remains limited by small samples, multicomponent interventions, inconsistent allocation and blinding, restricted populations, and short follow-up. Quantitative syntheses show average benefit but substantial between-study heterogeneity and possible small-study effects. We therefore propose a six-stage, review-derived pathway-detect and invite; differentiate and formulate; define a valued outcome; match and prepare; connect and verify; and review and adapt-with a separate failure-repair trigger rather than a seventh stage. The nursing contribution is described as clinical-relational integration: linking clinical assessment to the practical and interpersonal work required for an older adult to enter, test, and sustain a meaningful relationship or role. The pathway is a clinical heuristic, not a validated decision rule. Future studies should use hybrid effectiveness-implementation designs, report first-contact completion using an explicit denominator, assess relational harms, and examine equity and durability across settings.

Indexed as

LonelinessNurse's RoleNursing AssessmentSocial IsolationAgedHumansQuality of Lifeimplementation sciencelonelinessnursingolder adultspublic healthrelational caresocial isolationsocial prescribing

Identifiers

PMID42840817
PMCPMC13639791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.