Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42840814›Full record

ReviewPain reports2026

Peripheral nerve field stimulation for chronic low back pain: a systematic review.

Reza Hazrati, Elie Ruest, Baraa Dabboucy, Sobee Dansereau, Chloe Salamon, Shirley Fecteau, Michel Prudhomme

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pain reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Reza HazratiNeurosurgery Service, Department of Surgery, CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7837-0636
Elie RuestNeurosurgery Service, Department of Surgery, CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Baraa DabboucyNeurosurgery Service, Department of Surgery, CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Sobee DansereauNeurosurgery Service, Department of Surgery, CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Chloe SalamonNeurosurgery Service, Department of Surgery, CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Shirley FecteauDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Michel PrudhommeNeurosurgery Service, Department of Surgery, CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) presents a major challenge in pain management, often persisting despite standard therapies. Peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNFS), also known as subcutaneous stimulation, offers a minimally invasive neuromodulation approach that may improve outcomes for these patients. This systematic review evaluates the evidence on PNFS, alone or combined with spinal cord stimulation (SCS), for CLBP, focusing on pain relief, functional outcomes, and safety. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, databases including Cochrane, Embase, MEDLINE (PubMed), and the Université Laval Library were searched for studies from January 2014 to April 2025. Nineteen studies (randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case series) were included. Outcomes assessed included pain intensity, disability (Oswestry Disability Index), quality of life (36-Item Short Form Health Survey, EuroQol 5-Dimension), and adverse events. Across study-level estimates, PNFS monotherapy most commonly produced approximately 40% to 60% reductions in pain intensity, although reported effects varied across studies and were not pooled because of heterogeneity. Functional gains included reduced disability and improved mobility. Quality of life measures and medication use often improved. Peripheral nerve field stimulation combined with SCS yielded mixed results, providing benefits particularly for patients unresponsive to SCS alone. Reported complication rates were generally modest, with infections and lead migrations being the most common. Peripheral nerve field stimulation appears to be a promising and generally well-tolerated option for selected patients with CLBP, although evidence certainty remains limited, and larger controlled studies are needed.

Indexed as

Chronic low back painNeuromodulationPeripheral nerve field stimulationSubcutaneous stimulationSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42840814
PMCPMC13641655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.