ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Efficacy of Manual Lymphatic Drainage in Reducing Postoperative Complications After Cosmetic Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cosmetic plastic surgical procedures, such as liposuction and abdominoplasty, often disrupt the lymphatic system, leading to complications, including swelling, pain, fibrosis, and seromas. Manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) is commonly recommended postoperatively to enhance lymphatic flow and accelerate healing. However, evidence regarding its efficacy remains inconsistent, particularly in cosmetic procedures. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of MLD in reducing postoperative swelling, pain, fibrosis, seromas, and recovery time compared with standard care following cosmetic procedures and assess secondary outcomes, including bruising, patient satisfaction, and adverse effects. Methods: This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched from inception to September 2025 for studies involving adults undergoing cosmetic surgery. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case series. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I tools. Owing to heterogeneity among the studies, findings were narratively synthesized. Results: Seven studies were included, primarily RCTs and prospective trials involving cosmetic procedures such as liposuction and abdominoplasty. MLD, alone or with other therapies, reduced swelling, showed variable pain relief, and indicated potential fibrosis mitigation. Efficacy varied by procedure, with better outcomes when initiated early (days 2-5) and delivered in 6-12 sessions. Adverse events were minimal. Conclusions: MLD provides moderate benefits for postoperative swelling reduction after cosmetic surgery, with inconsistent effects on pain and fibrosis. High-quality RCTs are needed to refine protocols and confirm long-term efficacy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.